Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Holstein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 2007Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 It is undisputed that Kristine Holstein was only a spectator at the drag race. Therefore, the narrow issue is whether merely being a spectator fits within the statutory prohibition of 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3367(b) that “no person shall in any manner participate in any such race, competition, contest, test or exhibition.” [Emphasis supplied.]

¶ 2 I believe the answer has to be “no” for two reasons, and accordingly am compelled to dissent: first, because the legislature could have said “spectator” if it wished to criminalize merely being a spectator, as can be seen in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. McClinticSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. RyanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. ScolieriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API