Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Scolieri

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 2002No. 25 WAP 2002PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice NEWMAN.

Notwithstanding the seriousness with which we consider the problem of underage drinking, we must accept that when the General Assembly selects words to use in a statute, it has chosen them purposefully. 1 Pa.C.S. § 1921(b). We cannot change those words to reflect our own public policy concerns, nor can we edit them based on the supposition that we know what the General Assembly meant to say when it said something different. Where, as here, we do not believe that application of the words of the General Assembly would yield an absurd or unconstitutional result, we accord…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KoczwaraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Triffin v. DillaboughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. In Re: Vencil, N. Appeal of: PA State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Burke, A., Aplt. v. Independence Blue CrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Penjuke v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Commonwealth v. CahillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API