Legal Opinion
Ruffin v. Armco Steel Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 31, 1997No. Civ. A. H-96-4480PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GILMORE, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Instrument No. 5). After careful consideration of the submissions of the parties and applicable authority, the Court has determined that Plaintiffs Motion should be GRANTED.
I
This action was originally filed in state court by Plaintiff Annie Bell Ruffin, (“Estate”), individually and on behalf of the heirs of the estate of J. Frank Ruffin, Sr. (“Ruf-fin”), against Defendants Armco Steel Corporation (“Armco”), J.T. Thorpe Company, (“Thorpe”), and Guard-Line, Inc. (“Guard-Line”). Ruffin worked at Armco’s steel…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Willy v. Coastal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Donald J. Willy, and George A. Young v. The Coastal Corp., Coastal States Management Co., Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Isaacson v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Arness v. Boeing North American, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Freiberg v. Swinerton & Walberg Property Services, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2002
- In Re Wireless Telephone Radio Frequency EmissionsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- In Re Wireless Telephone Radio Frequency Emissions Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.