Legal Opinion
Arness v. Boeing North American, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 26, 1998No. CV 97-8623 ABC MCxPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND
COLLINS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’ motion to remand came on regularly for hearing before this Court on January 26, 1998. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion to remand is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ request for costs and attorney’s fees is DENIED.
I. Background
A. Procedural Background
On October 21, 1997, Plaintiffs James K. Arness, et. al. (“Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint (“Complaint”) in the Los Angeles Su perior Court alleging state law causes of action…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Alsup v. 3-Day Blinds, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Isaacson v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- In Re Wireless Telephone Radio Frequency EmissionsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Tremblay v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.