Freiberg v. Swinerton & Walberg Property Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REMANDING CASES TO STATE COURT
KANE, District Judge.
Defendant contractors and former manufacturers and distributors of asbestos-containing products invoke 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1) to remove five state law personal injury/asbestosis actions from state to federal court. Defendants join in the Removal Notice of Co-Defendant Swiner-ton Walberg Property Services, Corp. (“Swinerton”), one of the contractors whose construction activities at the U.S. government’s Rocky Flats nuclear weapons production facility form the basis of Plaintiffs’ exposure claims. Swinerton asserts it was “acting under” a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- International Primate Protection League v. Administrators of Tulane Educational FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Alsup v. 3-Day Blinds, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
- Isaacson v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Cabalce v. VSE Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
- Nesbiet v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Brokaw v. Boeing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.