Roquemore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge.
Appellant Michael Roquemore appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent State Farm, arguing that the loss of an athletic scholarship constitutes a loss of income under the Minnesota No-Fault Insurance Act. We affirm.
FACTS
Roquemore suffered injuries to his back, hip, and knee when he was hit by a car as he walked on a street. At the time of the accident, he was attending a university on a football scholarship that paid his tuition, room, and board. Because of his injuries, Roquemore could not play football and the university did not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hickok v. MargolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Rindahl v. National Farmers Union Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bremer Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. MatejcekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018