Legal Opinion

State v. Steen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2000No. 990332 to 990334PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Vance Owen Steen appealed from criminal judgments entered on jury verdicts finding him guilty of negligent homicide, leaving the scene of an accident involving death or personal injury, and driving in violation of a restricted license. We conclude submission to the jury of an incorrect verdict form on negligent homicide was harmless error and the evidence was sufficient to support Steen’s conviction for leaving the scene of an accident. We further conclude the trial court failed to comply with N.D.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(4)(E), and we remand to the court for the limited purpose…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States v. Puig-InfanteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. United States v. GaytanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. John PforzheimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. People v. RibowskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. HidanovicNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. JacobNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. FrohlichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. MuhleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. CarpenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API