Clawson v. Doe
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Rush Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
Ejectment. The facts of this case are, that on the 4th of November, 1833, Rebecca Ross then being sole and unmarried, but now the wife of Moore, one of the lessors of the plaintiff conveyed by deed of general warranty to the plaintiff in error, Clawson, for a valuable consideration, all her right and title to the premises in question. At the time of the conveyance she was an infant. Claioson entered upon the premises, and remained until the commencement of this suit in, the quiet and uninterrupted possession of them. The present suit was brought by the said Rebecca and her husband to recover…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Taylor v. M'CrackinIndiana Supreme Court · 1829
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dob v. AbernathyIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
- Welborn v. KimmerlingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Furst v. SatterfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Indiana Union Traction Co. v. MaherIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Pilotte v. BrummettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.