Pilotte v. Brummett
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CASE SUMMARY
Buchanan, J.
Defendant-Appellant Norbert Pilotte (Pilotte) appeals from a trial court judgment ejecting him from a farm owned by Appellees, Pearl Brummett, Sidney Farney, Grace Stoller, and Josephine Farney (collectively the Landlords), claiming (1) insufficient evidence to support the Landlords’ possessory action for ejectment; (2) insufficient notice to terminate Pilotte’s tenancy; and (3) erroneous admission of Josephine Farney’s (Josephine) agency relationship to the Landlords.
We affirm.
FACTS
The evidence and facts more favorable to the trial court’s judgment are:
In the fall of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Cantwell v. CantwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Evansville v. FollisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Hoosier Insurance Company v. OgleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- McClellan v. BeattyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brummett v. PilotteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Murray v. City of LawrenceburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Gardner v. PROCHNOIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Murray v. City of LawrenceburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Pilotte v. BrummettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.