Legal Opinion

Furst v. Satterfield

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1909No. 6,475PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Delaware Circuit Court; John M. Morris, Special Judge. Action by Christian Furst and another, against John H. Satterfield. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

The appellants brought this action against the appellee in ejectment to recover a strip of land nineteen feet wide, on the west side of their land in section thirty-one, township twenty-one, range eleven east, in Delaware county, Indiana. The court, upon request, made a special finding of facts and stated its conclusions of law thereon. *615The facts are, in substance', as follows: On November 28, 1885, Samuel Beall was the owner and in possession of the north half of section thirty-one, township twenty-one, range eleven east, in Delaware county, Indiana. On said day he sold and conveyed (his…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Wilson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Roberts v. . BaumgartenNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Miller v. McGlaunSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  5. State Bank v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Freiburger v. FryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Rosenmeier v. MahrenholzIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Stalcup v. LingleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Jose v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Boyd v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API