Legal Opinion
Patlex Corporation v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 20, 1985No. 19-1918PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Appellants Patlex Corporation and Gordon Gould (herein referred to collectively as Gould) request rehearing of the court’s decision of March 7, 1985. Patlex Corp. v. Mossinghoff, 758 F.2d 594, 225 USPQ 243 (Fed.Cir.1985). We deny the petition to the extent that it relates to our affirmance of the district court’s decision that 35 U.S.C. §§ 301-307, applied retroactively, do not violate the Fifth Amendment, or the Seventh Amendment, or Article III of the Constitution; that 35 U.S.C. § 282 does not apply to reexamination; and that Manual of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- King Instruments Corporation v. Luciano Perego and Tapematic, Defendant/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. EDO Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.