Legal Opinion

Timis v. Young

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2001No. 00-232PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Jim and Connie Timis (Timises) brought suit in the Eleventh Judicial District Court against Mark, John and Rose Young (Youngs) alleging negligence and negligent supervision in the operation of their business, Rose’s Day Care. The Timises agreed to settle the case prior to trial but later repudiated the settlement. The District Court then granted the Youngs’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement and dismiss the underlying action. The Timises’ subsequent motion to set aside this order was deemed denied when the District Court failed to rule on it within sixty days. The Timises now…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Day v. PayneMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re the Marriage of HanniMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re the Marriage of BellMontana Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wamsley v. NODAK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Bud-Kal v. City of KalispellMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Bud-Kal v. City of KalispellMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Ray v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Timis v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API