Bud-Kal v. City of Kalispell
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mcgrath
¶1 This is an appeal from the District Court’s June 12, 2008, Order and Rationale on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Kalispell and the other defendants and denying the motion for summary judgment by Bud-Kal and the other plaintiffs. We affirm.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
¶2 This action arose from the creation of a downtown business improvement district (BID) in the City of Kalispell in 2003. Creation of a BID is exclusively a statutory process set out in §§ 7-12-1101 through -1151, MCA. A BID can only be created by action of the local…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BretzMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Merlin Myers Revocable Trust v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Enger v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baxter v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Kilby Butte Colony, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
- Barrett v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2024
- Asurion Services, LLC v. Montana Insurance Guaranty Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.