Legal Opinion

Bud-Kal v. City of Kalispell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2009No. DA 08-0318PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mcgrath

¶1 This is an appeal from the District Court’s June 12, 2008, Order and Rationale on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Kalispell and the other defendants and denying the motion for summary judgment by Bud-Kal and the other plaintiffs. We affirm.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶2 This action arose from the creation of a downtown business improvement district (BID) in the City of Kalispell in 2003. Creation of a BID is exclusively a statutory process set out in §§ 7-12-1101 through -1151, MCA. A BID can only be created by action of the local…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. BretzMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Merlin Myers Revocable Trust v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Enger v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Baxter v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Kilby Butte Colony, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Barrett v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Asurion Services, LLC v. Montana Insurance Guaranty Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API