Legal Opinion

Wamsley v. NODAK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2008No. DA 06-0194PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 On June 23,2003, Appellees Corey Jay Wamsley and Jeffrey Alan Wamsley, in their capacities as co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Alan and Sharon Wamsley (Estate), filed suit against Appellant Nodak Mutual Insurance Company (Nodak) in the Eighteenth Judicial District. The Estate sought compensation for damages from an August 2002 automobile accident near Bozeman, Montana, in which their parents, Alan and Sharon Wamsley (Wamsleys), were killed. In its suit, the Estate sought to “stack,” or combine the coverage of, three underinsured motorist (UIM) policies *469issued to the Wamsleys by…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Alltrade, Inc. v. Uniweld Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Pacesetter Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. And Med Rel Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Modroo v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Milky Whey, Inc. v. Dairy Partners, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Gibbs v. AltenhofenMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. D.R. Four Beat Alliance, LLC v. Sierra Production Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Great American Assurance Co. v. Discover Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API