Legal Opinion

Timis v. Young

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2001No. 00-232Published

1Opinion of the Court

22 P.3d 1122 (2001)

2001 MT 63

Jim TIMIS and Connie Timis, both individually and on behalf of their minor daughter, Chardee Timis, Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

Mark YOUNG, John Young and Rose Young, d/b/a Rose's Day Care, Defendants and Respondents.

No. 00-232.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Submitted on Briefs October 19, 2000.

Decided April 18, 2001.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing May 15, 2001.

Frank B. Morrison, Jr., Morrisons, McCarthy and Baraban, Whitefish, Milton Datsopoulos, Datsopoulos, MacDonald and Lind, Missoula, for Appellants.

Anita Poe, Garlington, Lohn and Robinson, Missoula, for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Day v. PayneMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re the Marriage of HanniMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re the Marriage of BellMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Timis v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API