Legal Opinion

Galloway v. Hood

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1941No. 3834PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOvermyer, J.

This is a malpractice action, which was filed in Common Pleas Court on May 9, 1941, by the appellant as plaintiff against the defendants, appellees herein, who are attorneys at law, duly admitted to practice in this state. The' action sought a recovery for alleged nonfeasance in the handling of plaintiff’s claims under the Ohio workmen’s compensation law.

The petition of plaintiff asserted two causes of action, based upon the following alleged, substantive facts:

Plaintiff, in 1934 and theretofore, was an employee of The Spicer Manufacturing Company of Toledo, Ohio, a self-insurer under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. WILCOX v. the Executors of PlummerSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Fox v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. Bickel v. WhitacreOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Muir v. Hadler Real Estate Management Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Sam v. BalardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Mattingly v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Keaton Co. v. KolbyOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Hood v. McConemyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API