Legal Opinion

Fox v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 30, 1889No. 3305PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Smith County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 29. Attorney at law; liability of for negligence; petition in suit against held sufficient. Pox sued Jones, as *49an attorney at law, to recover of him the amount due on a promissory note placed in his hands and accepted by him for collection September 15, 1886, and then lacking fifteen or sixteen days of being barred by the statute of limitations of four years. Jones failed to collect or return the note to Fox. In substance, the cause of action, as alleged in plaintiff’s original petition filed September 29, 1888, and in his amended petition filed May 22, 1889, is that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrison Machine Works v. ReigorTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Oldham v. SparksTexas Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zidell v. BirdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Family Savings and Loan, Inc. v. CiccarelloWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Crawford v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Galloway v. HoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Cox v. RosserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API