Legal Opinion

Hood v. McConemy

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 22, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 3808PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.

This case is presently before the Court on the motions of both defendants for summary judgment against the plaintiffs, Denny L. Hood and Harriet C. Hood (“Hoods”), and the motion of the defendant Ernest S. Wilson (“Wilson”) for summary judgment on the cross-complaint of the defendant Raymond L. Mc-Conemy (“McConemy”) for indemnification and contribution. The action is based upon alleged legal malpractice, and is predicated upon the defendants’ joint representation of the plaintiffs in a prior medical malpractice suit.1

The Hoods are residents of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  4. Henry S. Cram v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd., Robert S. Wahab, Jr. v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  5. Friday v. SmootSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cherry v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. The Gates Rubber Company, a Corporation v. Usm Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  3. Garcia v. Community Legal Services Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Sheetz, Inc. v. Bowles Rice McDavid Graff & Love, PLLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. McLean v. AlexanderDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API