Legal Opinion

Bickel v. Whitacre

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1939No. 5558PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

An examination of the petition indicates that the plaintiff sought to state a cause of action against the defendant Whitacre as a Justice of the Peace. The evidence, however, clearly develops that the employment of Whitacre was as an attorney. The cause of action against him as such would expire in one year from the acts constituting malpractice. Such time had expired before instituting the suit.

The judgment of the trial court is correct, and the same is affirmed.

ROSS, PJ, HAMILTON & MATTHEWS, JJ, concur.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Galloway v. HoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1941