Legal Opinion
Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 16, 2015No. 13-35251PublishedCited by 478 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Loredana Ranza appeals the district court’s dismissal of her complaint alleging sex and age discrimination in the workplace in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2, 2000e-3, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 623. Ranza brought claims in the District of Oregon against her former employer, Nike European Operations Netherlands, B.V. (NEON), and NEON’s parent company, Nike, Inc., which is headquartered in Oregon. The alleged discriminatory conduct occurred in the Netherlands.
We…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by478 opinions
- George Williams v. Yamaha Motor Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Global Comm. Trading Grp. v. Beneficio De Arroz Choloma, SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Boon Global Limited v. Usdc-CaoakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Anwar v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Impossible Foods Inc. v. Impossible X LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
473 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.