Legal Opinion
Raczkowski v. Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 8, 1999No. AC 17729; AC 17737PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STOUGHTON, J.
The defendants, Naugatuck Zoning Commission (commission) and Nichols Realty, LLC (Nichols), appeal from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the plaintiff James H. Raczkowski’s appeal from the commission’s decision granting Nichols’ application for a special permit to excavate sand and gravel in connection with approval of a residential subdivision application. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following relevant facts. Nichols obtained approval for a thirty-nine lot subdivision on a 50.16 acre tract in an R-15 residential zone1 in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Calandro v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gevers v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Children's School, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- City of Torrington v. Zoning Commission of HarwintonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- St. Joseph's High School, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Martland v. Zoning Com'n of Town of WoodburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.