Legal Opinion

State v. Emery

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 21, 1992No. L90-0163CR; CA A69343PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*657EDMONDS, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for illegal possession of a game mammal, assigning as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss because of the delay in bringing him to trial. We affirm.

On October 31, 1988, defendant was cited for illegally possessing a game mammal during the closed season. On September 7, 1990, he moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that he had been denied his right to a speedy trial under ORS 135.747 and Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution. After the court denied the motion, a jury convicted defendant.

ORS 135.747 provides:

“If a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. IvoryOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Application of HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. MendeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. DykastOregon Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. EmeryOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. ChinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. MoylettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. CogginCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. State v. ChinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API