State v. Mende
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
Defendant in this criminal case seeks review of the determination by the Court of Appeals that he was not denied his right to a speedy trial under Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution by a 16-month delay between indictment and the time of his arrest, the delay being due entirely to budget restrictions that reduced the number of police officers who were available to serve arrest warrants. We affirm.
Defendant was indicted on October 21, 1983, for the crime of unlawfully obtaining food stamps. Because budgetary limitations in the Lane County Sheriffs office resulted in a temporary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. IvoryOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Application of HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. VawterOregon Supreme Court · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State v. FishOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. EmeryOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HarbertsOregon Supreme Court · 2000
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.