Legal Opinion
State v. Dykast
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1985No. CC 8301-0185, 8301-0186, 8301-0187, CA A30963, A30964, A30965 and SC S31757PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*370PETERSON, C. J.
The question is whether the defendant’s rights to a speedy trial were violated where 560 days elapsed between his original arrest and the trial. We hold that the defendant’s rights were not violated and affirm his conviction.
The chronology of events is:
March 30,1982 The defendant was indicted on two charges of delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992.
March 31,1982 The defendant was arrested.
April 1, 1982 The defendant was released on bail.
April 6,1982 The defendant was charged with two more violations under ORS 475.992.
April 22, 1982 Arraignment.
May 20,1982 The defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. IvoryOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Application of HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. VawterOregon Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. EmeryOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MendeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HarbertsOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.