Legal Opinion
Pulos v. James
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1973No. 771S216, 771S211PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPrentice, J.
These cases are concerned with the same subject matter and determined by the same constitutional proscription. Accordingly, they are here consolidated. Although other issues have been raised, both cases must be governed by a determination of the constitutionality of the 1965 amendment to the 1907 general act covering disannexa tion and a vacation of streets, highways and plats. The statute with which we are here concerned is § 1, ch. 277 of the Acts of 1965, which was re-enacted with but slight changes by § 609, ch. 239 of the Acts of 1969, 1972 Supp., 1963 Repl. Bums Ind. Ann. Stat. §48-916,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Hairston v. Danville & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Davenport v. New England Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
- Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Chapman v. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gordon E. Gouveia, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Kathleen Sue Hiles v. Barbara TazbirCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- William Daniels and Judy Daniels v. The Area Plan Commission of Allen CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Adult Group Properties, Ltd. v. ImlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Dible v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Clem v. Christole, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.