Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Ass'n

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 2, 1979PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

Believing that a rule of the defendant Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association, Inc., (MIAA) that "No boy may play on a girls’ team,” as impressed upon and carried out by public schools under school committee jurisdiction, was unlawful, the State Board of Education referred the matter to the Attorney General for appropriate action under G. L. c. 15, § 1G. 3 The Attorney General decided to resort to litigation and, joining with him the Board of Education and the Commissioner of Education, he commenced the present action in October, 1978, in the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. O'CONNELL v. ChasdiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Sarah Anne Williams Wayne Williams, on Behalf of Their Minor Son, John Williams v. The School District of Bethlehem, PaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Comfort v. Lynn School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. ChouMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. Doe v. MaherConnecticut Superior Court · 1986

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API