Commonwealth v. Hammond
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
STEVENS, J.:
¶ 1 The Commonwealth appeals from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill County, which granted Appellee’s petition filed under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa. C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546 vacated Appellee’s judgment of sentence, and directed a new trial due to the ineffective assistance of trial counsel, coupled with after-discovered evidence.1 The Commonwealth contends the PCRA court erred in granting Appel-lee a new trial on the basis (1) trial counsel was ineffective in failing to call as a witness and investigate properly Achille Walker and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. D'AmatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. FitzgeraldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. SarveySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. RenchenskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Bobbie L. Brown v. John Wetzel, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.