Commonwealth v. Smith
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
GANTMAN, P.J.:
Appellant, Jamar Smith, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, following his bench trial conviction for aggravated assault, recklessly endangering another person and possession of an instrument of crime. 1 We affirm.
The trial court opinion sets forth the relevant facts and procedural history of this appeal as follows:
At a waiver trial, the Commonwealth presented the testimony of Complainant, James Kedra, Philadelphia Police Officer, Robert Bakos, and Northeast Detective, Robert Schill. Additionally, they admitted…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. SepulvedaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. ReynoldsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. BullickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by157 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. KoniasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. McFaddenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Com. v. Williams, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Green, V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.