Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 2014No. 663 EDA 2013PublishedCited by 157 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

GANTMAN, P.J.:

Appellant, Jamar Smith, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, following his bench trial conviction for aggravated assault, recklessly endangering another person and possession of an instrument of crime. 1 We affirm.

The trial court opinion sets forth the relevant facts and procedural history of this appeal as follows:

At a waiver trial, the Commonwealth presented the testimony of Complainant, James Kedra, Philadelphia Police Officer, Robert Bakos, and Northeast Detective, Robert Schill. Additionally, they admitted…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. SepulvedaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. ReynoldsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. BullickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by157 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. KoniasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. McFaddenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Com. v. Williams, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Com. v. Green, V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API