McMullan v. Dickinson Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Smith, J., sustaining a demurrer to the second defense set up in the answer.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
On February 25, 1892, the plaintiff entered into a written agreement with the defendant corporation, whereby it agreed to employ him as its assistant manager, from and after that date, as long as he should own in his own name 50 shares of the capital stock of said corporation, fully paid up, and the business of said corporation should be continued, not exceeding the term of the existence of said corporation, and pay him for such services the sum of $1,500'per annum, payable monthly during that time, and whereby he agreed to perform said services during that time. He has ever since owned, as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strauss v. MeertiefSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Fowler v. ArmourSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Gordon v. BrewsterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Colburn v. WoodworthNew York Supreme Court · 1860
- Moody v. LeverichNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1873
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Skagerberg v. Blandin Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Hamilton v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Riefkin v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1923
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.