Legal Opinion

Wright v. Carter

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1993No. 51S01-9310-CV-1178PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

When radiologist Donald D. Donner, M.D., moved for summary judgment on the medical malpractice claim of Betty Carter, Carter did not respond with any expert evidence. Instead, she relied on the rule of res ipsa loquitur. Given the facts underlying Carter’s claim, we hold that this was an insufficient response and that Donner was entitled to summary judgment.

Carter brought this malpractice action upon learning that a 1.1 centimeter piece of wire had been inadvertently left in her left breast after a biopsy. Donner had inserted the wire prior to a surgery by defendant Dr.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vergara Ex Rel. Vergara v. DoanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Burke v. CapelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Funk v. BonhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Gramm v. BoenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Longfellow v. VernonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Colonial Penn Insurance v. GuzorekIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tibbs v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Blake v. Calumet Construction Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Shell Oil Co. v. Lovold Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Moberly v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API