Legal Opinion

Herzog v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 6, 1985No. 6774-9-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, C.J.

Some recipients of workers' compensation disability payments are also entitled to social security payments. When this is so, federal law prohibits the combined benefits from exceeding 80 percent of the recipient's average current earnings at the time the disability was suffered. Combined benefits exceeding this level must be reduced. 1 Federal law permits a state to take full advan tage of this by permitting the reduction to be taken entirely from the state benefits. 2 Washington has accepted this largess by the enactment of RCW 51.32.220. 3

The dispute in this case is about how this reduction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Personal Restraint of PiercyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Trayle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. DeWeese v. City of Port TownsendCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stuckey v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Stuckey v. Dept. of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Ravsten v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. WarfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Frazier v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API