Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 7, 2000No. 24000-9-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

3 P.3d 221 (2000)

101 Wash.App. 411

Aubry D. FRAZIER, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent.

No. 24000-9-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

July 7, 2000.

Carol L. Casey, Casey & Casey P.S., Port Orchard, for Appellant.

Lisa Marsh, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

SEINFELD, J.

Aubry Frazier claims that the Department of Labor and Industries (Department) improperly reduced his disability benefits by the amount of social security retirement benefits that he had been receiving. He argues that because he received a lump sum disability payment rather than monthly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stuckey v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Stuckey v. Dept. of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Ravsten v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Allan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Harrison Memorial Hosp. v. GagnonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Harrison Memorial Hospital v. GagnonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Birgen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Doan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Doan v. STATE, DEPT. OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIESCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API