In Re the Personal Restraint of Piercy
Washington Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The Court of Appeals, Division Three, certified the following question, raised in these consolidated personal restraint petitions, to this court:
Where a prison inmate has been afforded procedural due process for disciplinary violations, must he be afforded the opportunity to personally appear before the Board of Prison Terms and Paroles pursuant to RCW 9.95.080 when it decides to deny him good time credits because of the disciplinary violations?
The answer is no. Accordingly, we dismiss the consolidated personal restraint petitions with prejudice.
Petitioners Ronald Piercy and Kenneth Agtuca…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Monohan v. BurdmanWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Dawson v. Hearing CommitteeWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Linden v. BungeWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Newschwander v. Board of Trustees of Washington State Teachers' Retirement SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- In the Matter of Personal Restraint of PowellWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Mota v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Personal Restraint of GronquistWashington Supreme Court · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.