Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Khumprakob v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2018No. 2018-0404PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

*1185 *582 {¶ 1} In this case, relators, four Youngstown electors, 1 seek a writ of mandamus to compel respondents, the Mahoning County Board of Elections and its members (collectively, "the board"), to place a proposed amendment to the Youngstown city charter-a so-called "Youngstown Drinking Water Protection Bill of Rights"-on the May 2018 ballot. The proposed charter amendment, if adopted by Youngtown's electors, would in general terms (1) recognize certain rights of Youngstown residents and of "ecosystems and natural communities within the city" to "clean water, air, and soil" and to be free from…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Waters v. SpaethOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. City of South Euclid v. JemisonOhio Supreme Court · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. William Schmitt v. Frank LaRoseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. State ex rel. Twitchell v. Saferin (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Schmitt v. Ohio Sec'y of State Jon HustedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
  4. Beiersdorfer v. LaRoseDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
  5. Schmitt v. HustedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API