Schmitt v. Ohio Sec'y of State Jon Husted

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is presently before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff's Application *788for a Temporary Restraining Order. (ECF No. 3.) For the reasons set forth herein, the motion is GRANTED.

I

A. Undisputed Relevant Facts

The following facts are set forth for the limited purpose of addressing the immediate motion before the Court. Any findings of fact and conclusions of law made by a district court in addressing a request for injunctive relief, particularly in consideration of a temporary restraining order, are not binding at a trial on…