Legal Opinion

Schmitt v. Husted

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 11, 2019No. Case No. 2:18-cv-966Published

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiffs William T. Schmitt and Chad Thompson's ("Plaintiffs") Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 3), which the Court previously granted (ECF No. 22), extended (ECF No. 26), and converted into a preliminary injunction, which expired on November 7, 2018 (ECF No.

*84528). By order of the Court (ECF No. 28), Defendants Ohio Secretary of State John Husted and the Portage County Board of Elections (the "Board")-individually, Craig M. Stephens, Patricia…

2Cases cited29 opinions

Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
Meyer v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
Dion R. McPherson v. Michigan High School Athletic Association, Inc., Board of Education of the Public Schools of the City of Ann ArborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.