Vance v. Richardson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. G. W. Hunter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment rendered for plaintiff. The action is to recover damages for an alleged assault and battery committed by appellant upon the person of respondent. The jury gave damages in the sum of four hundred and fifty dollars. The only questions involved relate to certain alleged errors of law.
Appellant contends that the court erred in a ruling concerning his right of peremptorily challenging jurors. It seems that during the examination of the jurors, and before the panel was filled, each party had alternately exercised peremptory challenges. When the panel was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ScogginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Elliott v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Silcox v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Gebhart v. BurkettIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Taylor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Deevy v. TassiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re Cheryl H.California Court of Appeal · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.