Legal Opinion

Van Gilder v. Eagleson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1919No. 9207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Denver District Court, Hon. John T. Shumate, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Teller.

Dependant in error had judgment in an action to rescind a contract with plaintiff in error The German American Indemnity Company on the ground of fraud.

The complaint, as amended, sets up a contract of employment of the plaintiff to sell stock for the company, with a provision that it might be cancelled at the end of sixty days, in which case fifteen hundred dollars, paid on a subscription for five hundred shares, and two notes of $750, each, paid for five hundred additional shares, were to be returned to him. It was further alleged that the contract was obtained…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Scott v. DeweeseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Chubb v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Ogilvie v. Knox Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1860
  5. Bissell v. HeathMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tisdel v. Central Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  2. Burningham v. BurkeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Cattell v. Denver State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  4. Julian v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API