Legal Opinion

Burningham v. Burke

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1926No. 4261PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

This is an action in equity, brought by the plaintiff, the appellant, to rescind a subscription or purchase of capital stock and to recover back moneys paid by him thereon. It is in substance alleged in the complaint that the defendant Utah Steel Corporation was a domestic corporation organized in July, 1919, and that the defendant Burke was appointed its receiver in July, 1922; that in the latter part of 1921 and in January, 1922, the corporation entered upon a campaign of selling its capital stock to the plaintiff and to the public generally and in such connection published and circulated…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Scott v. DeweeseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Parker v. Bethel Hotel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Chase v. ChaseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1897
  5. Newton Nat. Bank v. NewbeginCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jensen v. BledsoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Zundel v. ZundelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Openshaw v. OpenshawUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Verder v. American Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Goodin v. Palace Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API