Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Princeton Economic International Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 17, 2001No. 99 CIV. 9667(RO), 99 CIV. 9669(RO)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
OWEN, District Judge.
This Opinion and Order serves to supplement my prior oral findings and order of July 6, 2001 that the previously-imposed confinement of Martin A. Armstrong in the Metropolitan Correctional Center on an order of civil contempt still serves coercive purposes; it might yet yield its intended result and should therefore be continued in order to coerce compliance with this Court’s Contempt Order of August 25, 2000. The estimated value of the missing corporate assets, as documented by the Temporary Receiver, 1 is approximately $14.9 million and Armstrong has come…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002