Legal Opinion
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Armstrong
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 18, 2002No. Docket Nos. 01-6159(L), 01-6160(CON), 01-3073(CON)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Martin Armstrong appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Owen, J.) extending his confinement for civil contempt of court. We dismiss Armstrong’s appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
I
Armstrong has been incarcerated in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City since January 14, 2000, after the district court entered an order finding Armstrong in contempt of court for failing to turn over approximately $14.9 million worth of corporate assets to the court-appointed temporary receiver for Princeton Economics International…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- New York State National Organization for Women v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Morris Simkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission, Alan M. Cohen, Receiver-Appellee v. Martin A. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Princeton Economics International Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002