Legal Opinion
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Armstrong
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 18, 2002No. 01-6159PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
284 F.3d 404
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION & Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Respondents, and
Alan M. Cohen, Receiver-Appellee-Respondent,
v.
Martin A. ARMSTRONG, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner, and
Princeton Global Management Ltd. & Princeton Economics International Ltd., Defendants.
Docket No. 01-6159(L).
Docket No. 01-6160(CON).
Docket No. 01-3073(CON).
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued January 7, 2002.
Decided March 18, 2002.
Bernard V. Kleinman, White Plains, NY, for Appellant.
Martin Glenn, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, NY, for Appellee Alan M.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Morris Simkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission, Alan M. Cohen, Receiver-Appellee v. Martin A. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Princeton Economics International Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Princeton Economic International Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Princeton Economics International, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002