Legal Opinion

Woods v. Brzezinski

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 9, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Suit for an injunction to restrain the levy of an execution; brought to the District Court of Waterbury, and heard before Cowell, J. Facts found and judgment rendered for the defendants, and appeal by the plaintiff. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

A justice of the peace rendered a judgment against the plaintiff and issued an execution. The plaintiff brought this suit to restrain the levy of it. The court below rendered judgment for the defendants and the plaintiff appealed.

The first question arises under the plaintiff’s claim that *472he had no notice of the return day of the original suit. A copy of the complaint was duly left with the plaintiff. The return day was in fact on the second day of February, 1889. The copy was so badly written that he could not tell whether it was the second or third day. By comparing it with other parts of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Black v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  2. Thomas v. District Court of Third Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Jartman v. Pacific Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  4. Chasnoff v. PortoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API