Legal Opinion

Chasnoff v. Porto

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 4, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMellitz, J.

This case presents one aspect of the situation resulting from the efforts of the defendant Nierwakowski to collect a judgment obtained in an action against the plaintiff Chasnoff and another for negligent operation of a motor vehicle. Another aspect was dealt with in Gilman v. Joseloff, 135 Conn. 595, 67 A.2d 551, where Gilman and Chasnoff, the defendants in the original action, unsuccessfully sought to restrain Nierwakowski and his attorney from levying body executions to collect the judgment. The present action, brought by Chasnoff alone, seeks damages for abuse of process and false…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. H. O. Canfield Co. v. United Construction WorkersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Gilman v. JoseloffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  5. Woods v. BrzezinskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fulkerson v. LairdMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Abbit v. BernierDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
  3. Ditto v. McCurdyHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Rogers v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Rogers v. County CommissionersConnecticut Superior Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API