Legal Opinion

Frisco Lumber Co. v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 9, 1914No. 3704PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from District Court, McCurtain County; Summers Hardy, Judge. Action by John Thomas against the Frisco Lumber Company, for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff, and de- , fendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

John Thomas, plaintiff below, recovered a judgment against the Frisco Lumber Company, as defendant, on account of certain personal injuries alleged to have been sustained because of negligence. From this ■judgment the defendant has appealed to this court, and urges, in support of its contention for a reversal, three main propositions: First. That there should have been an instructed verdict for defendant. Second. Improper instructions to the jury. Third. Refusal to give a certain requested instruction to the jury.

1. The first point urged by the defendant, considering them…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Independent Cotton Oil Co. v. BeachamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Neeley v. Southwestern Cotton Seed Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  4. Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Coalgate Co. v. HurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ponca City Ice Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Chickasaw Compress Co. v. BowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Thomas v. Holliday by and Through HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. L. E. Whitham Const. Co. v. RemerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API