Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Adel

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided July 15, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02684Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Deshawn Briggs, et al., No. CV-18-02684-PHX-EJM 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Allister Adel, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Defendant 16 TASC’s MDPP Program Files. (Doc. 139). TASC filed a Response (Doc. 143), and 17 Plaintiffs filed a Reply (Doc. 144). The parties then filed supplemental briefs to address 18 the impact of the Public Health Service Act (“PHSA”), 42 U.S.C. § 290dd-2(a), and its 19 implementing regulations, Title 42, Chapter…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API