Legal Opinion
Briggs v. Adel
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 30, 2021No. 2:18-cv-02684Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Deshawn Briggs, et al., No. CV-18-02684-PHX-EJM 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 County of Maricopa, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Compel (Doc. 254). 16 Defendant TASC filed a Response (Doc. 268) and Plaintiffs filed a Reply (Doc. 271). 17 Plaintiffs request that the Court order TASC to search the emails of certain 18 employees most likely to have information critical to Plaintiffs’ case for class 19 certification and produce the relevant electronic files.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Dependable Highway Express, Inc. v. Navigators Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Roehrs v. Minnesota Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2005