Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania State Troopers' Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1996PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LORD, Senior Judge.

The Pennsylvania State Troopers’ Association (PSTA) appeals a final order of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (PLRB) *1185dismissing its claim that the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) committed an unfair labor practice pertaining to promotional examinations.

The PLRB found the following facts. A 1974 consent decree resolved a federal class action lawsuit brought by William H. Bolden and other police officers (Bolden plaintiffs) against the PSP alleging discrimination in the hiring and promotion of minorities.1 The decree addresses interim procedures and standards to be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Alice Hobbs v. Clarence Hawkins, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. Hollinger v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. O'Burn v. ShappDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Karan v. Nabisco, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Riedel v. HUMAN REL. COM'N OF READINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Soto v. PNC Bank (In Re Soto)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Yaracs v. Summit AcademyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Frackville Borough Police Department v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Upper St. Clair Police Officers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API