Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Morris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 28, 1924No. 13923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

The plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs below, filed their petition against the defendants, in which they allege they'are the heirs at law of J. H. Morris, who died intestate on Ftebruary 24, 1921, leaving a widow, Anna Morris, who was duly appointed the administratrix of the estate, and that defendants Rollin N. .and Miabel Morris are infants, and are in the custody of defendant Anna Morris. That at the time of his death the intestate was the owner ana. in possession of the following real property, to wit: N. % of S. E. % of sec. 7, twp. 15 N., R. 5 E.-I. M., containing 80…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hayden v. DannenbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Mendenhall v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Watashe v. TigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Chambers v. EmeryUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Denison v. PhippsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Teuscher v. GraggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Manhart v. ManhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Hanlon v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Allen v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Kinnett v. GoodnoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API