Hayden v. Dannenberg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Nowata County; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action by N. B. Dannenberg and J. S. Hogue against John F. Playden and B. F. Whitehill. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SPIARP, C.
It is difficult to understand the nature of plaintiffs’ cause of action from the language of the amended petition, the averments of which are vague, indefinite and uncertain. Both defendants’ motion to strike and make more definite and certain, as well as demurrer to the petition, were by the court overruled, the latter, only, being assigned as error.
Briefly, the petition charges that the plaintiffs and defendant Playden, in the year 1905, owned the right to an oil and gas lease on the allotment of Rebecca Condry (describing it), and that they did not know whether there…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moore v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Wellsburg & State Line Railroad v. Pan Handle Traction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
- Chambers v. EmeryUtah Supreme Court · 1896
- Moorman v. ArthurSupreme Court of Virginia · 1894
- Carter v. CarterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Oldland v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Teuscher v. GraggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Lewis v. SchaferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.